Product Selection
Putting greens are inherently under stress on a regular basis, and natural hormones inside the plant help the turf withstand this stress. At times, the turf cannot withstand the multitude of stresses with natural hormones alone. Superintendents utilize plant protectants, plant growth regulators, and to a lesser extent biostimulants, to keep putting green turf healthy and playing well despite these stresses. It gets incredibly complicated when applying products that contain hormones which could inadvertently create additional stress. While the claims can be broad, it cannot always be known how a product performs on your golf course unless it is applied alone.
Unlike traditional products used for controlling pests, the benefits of products that claim to increase plant health as a result of hormone responses are more difficult to ascertain. For example, a superintendent cannot assess an increase in photosynthesis without having access to expensive equipment and a well-equipped laboratory.
The best way to understand if hormones or hormone mimics are in a product is to ask the distributer and manufacturer. Without knowing the contents of a product, the hormone responses and plant health benefits can be unpredictable. A good analogy is our power grid. If every electrical device is turned on at the same time, there won’t be enough power to run everything. The same is true with hormones inside turf plants. If all the hormones inside the plant are turned on by using products containing hormones or hormone mimics, there will likely be either no response or a negative response.
Prior to purchasing a new product, seek out statistically analyzed data regarding the claimed benefits, not just side-by-side pictures. The best way to assess the performance of a product is by applying it alone over two to three months in a test area. Use a check plot to better understand the benefits or stresses from the product. If positive results are observed, the next step is to look at how this product performs in conjunction with other commonly applied products that produce desirable responses.
Conclusion
The number of products available to help keep putting greens healthy and playing well can be overwhelming. Manufacturers test products for years in a variety of conditions to ensure that when used properly they will not have any harmful effects on the turf, the environment, applicators or anyone that comes in contact with them. The unintended side effects that are possible when products containing hormones, or eliciting a hormonal response, are applied to turf under stress are difficult to predict. When developing a spray program for putting greens, it is best to keep the plan simple. Utilizing multiple plant growth regulators and biostimulants with additional products will result in unpredictable results and could add stress to the turf. There is value in applying products that contain hormones, but they must be used appropriately to maximize their positive effects.
References
Baldwin, C., Liu, H., McCarty, L. B., Luo, H and Toler, J. E. 2009. Nitrogen and Plant Growth Regulator Influence on ‘Champion’ Bermudagrass Putting Green under Reduced Sunlight. Agronomy Journal. 101(1): 75-81.
Barea, J., and Azcòn-Aguilar, C. 1981. Production of Plant Growth-Regulating Substances by the Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Glomus mosseae. Appl. and Environ. Microbiology. 43: 810-813.
Benelli, Jesse J. 2013. Non-target effects of strobilurin fungicide applications on creeping bentgrass putting greens during summer stress. Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee.
Bunnell, B. T., L. B. McCarty, and W. C. Bridges. 2005. ‘TifEagle’ Bermudagrass Response to Growth Factors and Mowing Height when Grown at Various Hours of Sunlight. Crop Sci. 45: 575-581.
Debona, D., Nascimento, K., Gomes, J., Aucique-Perez, C.E., and Rodrigues, F.A. 2016. Physiological changes promoted by a strobilurin fungicide in the rice - Bipolaris oryzae interaction. Pesticide Biochemisty and Physiology. 130: 8-16.
Groves, E., Howard, K., Hardy, G., and Burgess, T. 2015. Role of salicylic acid in phosphite-induced protection against Oomycetes; a Phytophthora cinnamomic – Lupinus augustifolius model system. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 141: 559-569.
Grossmann, K., Kwiatkowski, J., and Caspar, G. 1999. Regulation of Phytohormone Levels, Leaf Senescence and Transpiration by the Strobilurin Kresoxim-methyl in Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Plant Physiology. 154: 805-808.
Jespersen, D., Jingjin, Y., and Bingru, H. 2017. Metabolic Effects of Acibenzolar-S-Methyl for Improving Heat or Drought Stress in Creeping Bentgrass. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8: Article 1224.
Jiang, Chang-Jie, Shimono, M., Sugano, S., Kojima, M., Yazawa, K., Yoshida, R., Inoue, H., Hayashi, N., Sakakibara, H., and Takatsuji, H. 2010. Abscisic Acid Interacts Antagonistically with Salicylic Acid Signaling Pathway in Rice – Magnaporthe grisea Interaction. Molecular Plant – Microbe Interactions. 23(6): 791-798.
Martins, R., Martins, M., Silva, J., Pereira, M., Appezzato-da-Glória, B., and Castro, P. 2012. Thiamethoxam on the histological characteristics of sugarcane young roots. Ciência Rural. 42: 1936-1940.
Yamaguchi, I., Cohenk, J., Culler, A., Quint, M., Slovin, J., Nakajima, M., Yamaguchi, S., Sakakibara, H., Kuroha, T., Hirai, N., Yokota, T., Ohta, H., Kobayashi, Y., Mori, H., and Sakagami., Y. 2010. Comprehensive Natural Products II – Chemistry and Biology, Plant Hormones. 4: 9-125.